Search for: "C. Schultz" Results 41 - 60 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2011, 4:33 am
Schultz testified, and the suppression court credited his testimony, that he pulled appellant's underwear up after feeling a hard object under his buttocks, but he was unable to remove the object. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 1:46 am by zshapiro
Spanier, Senior Vice President-Finance and Business Gary C. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 4:47 am
As such, the officers had no justification to search the shed, particularly after Schultz specifically told them that only Ken stayed in it. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 4:28 am by Gregory Dell
., Nancy C. and her Kentucky disability lawyer filed a disability lawsuit against her employer and disability insurer alleging that the denial of her long-term disability benefits by the insurer was “arbitrary and capricious” and constituted a “breach of fiduciary duty and/or bad faith” on the part of the defendants. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:13 am
PRG-Schultz, Inc. will serve as a subcontractor to HDI, DCS and CGI in regions A, B and D. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 2:32 pm by Kirk Jenkins
This morning, a unanimous Illinois Supreme Court handed down its opinion in Schultz v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:33 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:DoctrineEric Loquin, Retour dépassionné sur l’arrêt INSERM c/ Fondation Leeten F. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A similar provision with respect a police officer as defined in Subdivision 1 of General Municipal Law §207-c is set out in Subdivision 2 of §207-c of the Retirement and Social Security Law.** The decision is silent as to whether Drozdowski was found eligible for line of duty disability retirement.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_05220.htm________________________ The Disability Benefits E-book – 2016… [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:26 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
LOPEZ SALAZAR, Elkin de Jesus), Camino del Remanso No. 80 Interior 2 , Colonia Lomas Country Club, Huixquilucan, Estado de Mexico C.P. 52779, Mexico; Carrera 8 No. 10-56 Of. 201, Cali, Colombia; Carrera 68D No. 25-10 , Lote 41 E/S Terminal, Bogota, Colombia; Carrera 68D No. 25B-86 Of. 504, Bogota, Colombia; Miguel Schultz No. 127, Colonia San Rafael, Delegacion Cuauhtemoc, Mexico City, Distrito Federal C.P. 06470, Mexico; c/o C.I. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge properly concluded the lot was not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection, thus the intrusion thereupon and search by Schultz and Jones did not violate Defendants’ Fourth Amendment rights. [read post]