Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 10:41 am
Companies in the transportation industry with operations in California have some positive news to celebrate. [read post]
1 May 2021, 1:44 pm
Additional Resources: California Trucking Association et al., v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 10:07 am
MSC16-01426 (California Superior Court for the County of Contra Costa), involved a dispute between medical marijuana collectives in Richmond, California. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
A California court of appeals recently held that utility companies operating in rural areas of the state do not collect a higher cost of capital, also referred to as a rate of return, than other utility companies. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 3:09 pm
However, the California State Supreme Court overturned the lower court’s ruling on all three claims. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:52 pm
Additional Resources: Goonewardene v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
B292762, Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District. [4] Associated Press, “Perk Up: California Says Coffee Cancer Risk Insignificant,” N.Y. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
A California court of appeals recently held that utility companies operating in rural areas of the state do not collect a higher cost of capital, also referred to as a rate of return, than other utility companies. [read post]
2 Oct 2021, 5:19 pm
’ (Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:15 am
While Plaintiffs' appeal was pending in our court, the Supreme Court decided Martinez v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:09 pm
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 5:46 am
Despite this language, the trial court and then the Dallas Court of Appeals applied California law and ruled the agreements unenforceable in Merritt, Hawkins & Associates, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:48 am
District Court for the Northern District of California in Barker v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:50 pm
Court Returns Cannabis Company Funds Seized in Stop In reaching its conclusion that the funds seized by DHS should be returned, prosecutors cited the law as set forth under U.S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm
The decision came in the case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 10:34 am
On November 30, 2016, the California Court of Appeal issued its opinion in Driscoll v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm
California companies have been required to reconsider their use of independent contractors since the state’s Supreme Court outlined the new ABC test in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
The verdict was returned on September 23, 2021, in the California Superior Court case of Richmond Compassionate Care Collective v. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:55 am
In federal court, plaintiffs are seeking reversal of an employee-contractor test laid forth in the California Supreme Court in the case of Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
