Search for: "CANADIAN LUMBER TRADE V US"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2016, 3:58 am
Many of the issues in this fifth round of the US-Canada Lumber trade war likely will be the same or very similar to issues raised in the previous four rounds. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 2:46 pm
They had to do with whether the lumber was angle cut on one or both ends and whether the lumber was certain to be used in the construction of roof trusses. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:59 pm
R. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:17 am
This latter risk arose in the Softwood Lumber case where Canada and the Canadian lumber industry pursued a strategy of challenging an affirmative U.S. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:01 am
Since 2003, they have conducted negotiations with the National Gallery that included minimum fees for use of existing copyright works. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Steele v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Steele v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Steele v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:52 am
” Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (Virgin founder Richard Branson on competition, Canadian Business, January 2013) _________________ “Every violation of the antitrust laws is a blow to the free-enterprise system envisaged by Congress” (Haw. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 2:20 pm
Myers v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 8:02 pm
Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm
" Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The problem is assessed with reference to the of the fourth and fifth phases of the Softwood Lumber controversy between the United States and Canada - an immense dispute featuring the interplay between domestic litigation, investment arbitration and dispute settlement conducted under the rules of different chapters of the regional trade agreement (North American Free Trade Agreement), WTO dispute settlement, as well as interstate arbitration proceedings conducted within… [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Arguably, we’re so immersed in them that we know more about US law, especially relating to civil rights, than we do about Canadian rights. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Phillips Issue: Whether a prison librarian can face personal liability under 42 U.S.C. 1983 for preventing an inmate from using a comb-binding machine to file a petition for certiorari at the U.S. [read post]
