Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. CHANCELLOR" Results 121 - 140 of 2,425
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am by Frank Cranmer
Although some Chancellors have in similar cases imposed a condition relating to offsetting in order to meet the challenge of meeting carbon neutrality, the Chancellor decided not to impose such a condition in these cases. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
It hasn’t been a good year for plaintiffs seeking to enforce non-compete clauses in Delaware Chancery Court, and things didn’t improve last month when Vice Chancellor Zurn issued her letter ruling in Centurion Service Group, LLC v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 12:23 am by Frank Cranmer
Douglas Strang, Scottish Legal News: Higgs v Farmor’s School and others. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am by David Pocklington
In short, the latter did not automatically ‘trump’ the views and wishes of the petitioners…Chancellor Eyre spoke with approval of the Guidance, whereas Chancellor Turner raised some real concerns about it. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 12:08 am by Frank Cranmer
Quick links David Etherington KC, Ecclesiastical Law Society Lecture: “In Defence of the Chancellor”: 13 September 2023, The Parish Church of St Mary-le-Bow, 18:00 – 19:30. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am by Eugene Volokh
From today's press release, by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:, about Palsgaard v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am by David Pocklington
The full document is available here and our summary is here, and reflects the leading judgment of Lord Bingham (at 21) and the comments of Lord Hope (at 49) in Regina (Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust [2006] 2 AC 148. [read post]