Search for: "CHARLES v. HOPE et al" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Hence, a death-row inmate must argue in this Court that Tennard, Smith, et al. announced new law, but, once he arrives in federal court, he must argue that those same cases simply reiterated clearly established law. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm by carie
Case 2:04-cv-01156- GLF-MRA Document 594 Filed 10/23/09 Page 1 of 4UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RICHARD COOEY, et al., Plaintiffs Case No. 2:04-cv-1156 JUDGE GREGORY FROST v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am by Bernard Bell
L.J. 845 , 855 & n.37 (1990)(“Justifying Secrecy”); see generally, CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT, ET. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am by SHG
Boutrous, Jr., et al., Petition for Review, Vergara v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:15 am by Matt Sundquist
Colleen Mastoney at the Chicago Tribune profiles Otis McDonald, the lead petitioner in McDonald, et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Pom Wonderful LLC v Hubbard et al | Biotech inventions: controversies, case law, uncertainties and financing.Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel… [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am by Schachtman
Ware, et al., “Statistics in Medicine — Reporting of Subgroup Analyses in Clinical Trials,” 357 New Engl. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am by David Kopel
She writes that: The amicus brief by Kopel et al. paints a picture of widespread gun carrying incongruous with this well-established history. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Watkins made its way up to the SCOTUS which held that Maryland's requirement for a person holding public office to state a belief in God violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.Then there was the case of McGowan et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 9:23 am
  While I always viewed the Holodeck as a plot contrivance to put Patrick Stewart et al. in silly costumes, Risch's inventor takes it seriously and develops a prototype. [read post]