Search for: "CHEEK v. EYE" Results 1 - 20 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am by Charon QC
In Palmer v Cornwall County Council [2009] EWCA Civ 456, Waller LJ ruled that a 14 year-old boy, hit in the eye during lunch break by a rock intended for a seagull, can sue Cornwall County Council. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 10:46 am
Just close your eyes and listen to the clock tick. 8. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
However, the defence argues that the victim herself jumped out of the train and fell, thereafter injuring herself.Now coming to the medical reports, they clearly mention the injury was on the cheek and towards the eye of the victim, showing an upward glide and no resistance by the hands of the victim. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 6:41 am
However, the defence argues that the victim herself jumped out of the train and fell, thereafter injuring herself.Now coming to the medical reports, they clearly mention the injury was on the cheek and towards the eye of the victim, showing an upward glide and no resistance by the hands of the victim. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 2:30 pm
The fall pushed plaintiff's left eye and cheek into the cups and tray. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 1:05 pm by Alain Leibman
Extension of this principle to tax cases was in doubt, however, by virtue of the Supreme Court’s decision in Cheek v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 7:28 am by Derek T. Muller
But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:50 pm
She also had fractured bones near her eye socket and cheek, which were consistent with having had her face 'stomped' on. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 6:10 am
The Third Circuit recently issued a fascinating sexual harassment opinion in Minarsky v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
If a ruling in an obscure tax case yesterday is any indication, the threshold for unacceptable chaos is surprisingly low.In Dept. of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]