Search for: "CLARENCE THOMAS"
Results 1 - 20
of 7,044
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 4:00 am
” Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife, Virginia Thomas, was directly involved in efforts to overturn the election.Much of the reaction to the upside-down flag episode has centered around whether it obligates Justice Alito to recuse from Insurrection-related cases. [read post]
17 May 2024, 11:45 am
Clarence Thomas continues to lawyerball the Senate. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:44 am
And online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a Jurisprudence essay titled “Even Clarence Thomas Can See That the 5th Circuit Is Just Making Up Nonsense; The conservative justices finally sent a strong message to a rogue lower court; But the sanity might not last. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:32 am
Carter, Bloomberg Law) Clarence Thomas led Supreme Court majority in upholding consumer protections. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
In an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, the majority said this arrangement does not conflict with the Constitution’s Appropriations Clause, which assigns ultimate control over spending to Congress. . . . [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:45 am
Presumably she could have seen Justice Thomas's draft opinion and then said to him something like this: "Great job, Clarence. [read post]
17 May 2024, 5:13 am
Let me start by saying that I am no fan of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas – quite the opposite. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
Justice Clarence Thomas Calls Criticism of Him ‘Nastiness’ and Lies’ MSN – Justin Jouvenal, Tobi Raji, and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 5/10/2024 After facing harsh questions about his judicial decisions and acceptance of lavish gifts from a billionaire, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas pushed back at his critics, saying he and his wife, Virginia Thomas, have endured “nastiness” and… [read post]
16 May 2024, 1:21 pm
The US Supreme Court held Thursday that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) funding does not violate the Appropriations Clause and is constitutionally valid, in a decision authored by Justice Clarence Thomas. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:55 am
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority, in a decision that relied heavily on both the text of the Constitution and early English and U.S. history. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:09 am
And Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:47 am
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, a jurist who, as Judge Abudu concedes, usually does not share her legal philosophy and positions. [read post]
14 May 2024, 3:00 am
Elections Illinois: “Illinois Democrats’ Law Changing the Choosing of Legislative Candidates Faces GOP Opposition” by John O’Connor (Associated Press) for MSN Ethics National: “Justice Clarence Thomas Calls Criticism of Him ‘Nastiness’ and Lies'” by Justin Jouvenal, Tobi Raji, and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) for MSN Florida: “DeSantis Clears Some Ethics Cases After 2 Years, but Others Still… [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:38 am
Marimow, The Washington Post) The biggest flaw in Justice Clarence Thomas’ newest complaints (Steve Benen, MSNBC) Coming up: On Thursday, May 16, the court expects to issue one or more opinions from the current term. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:57 am
* Clarence Thomas lashes out at the "nastiness and lies" he's had to deal with. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:00 am
On Friday, Justice Clarence "I hate D.C. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:40 pm
John Fritze of CNN reports that “Justice Clarence Thomas decries Washington as ‘hideous’ and pushes back on ‘nastiness’ of critics. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
Notably, many insisting that Merchan not recuse himself previously called for Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from any Trump-related cases due to his wife’s work for the GOP and Trump. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:41 pm
However, a concurring opinion by Justice Neil Gorsuch (joined by Justice Clarence Thomas) suggests there may be a majority in favor of a more fundamental challenge to the abusive asset forfeiture regimes that exist in many states. [read post]
9 May 2024, 8:55 am
In the last few years, Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch have separately criticized existing constitutional limitations on liability for defamation as too broad, without any mention of the widespread existence and availability of insurance protecting against liability for defamation. [read post]
