Search for: "CLARK v. McCONNELL"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2010, 4:55 pm
Clinton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Professor Michael McConnell points me to United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:45 pm
Clark would seem to foreclose such a challenge. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:13 am
I’m quoted at length on these issues in Neil Maghami’s new Capital Research Center profile of the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation, a key funder of the suits. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
McConnell, Mark E. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:51 pm
In the statement, Clarke warned that voting rights are under pressure to an extent not seen since the civil rights era and urged Congress to exercise its broad enforcement powers to restore the Act now or risk “backsliding into a nation where millions of citizens, particularly citizens of color, find it difficult to register, cast their ballot and elect candidates of choice…” Clark also emphasized the need to restore the “preclearance” mechanism of… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:26 pm
There's a brief mention of slavery, and otherwise all of the originalist heavy lifting is delegated to a page-long discussion of the Iowa Supreme Court's previously obscure 1866 decision in Clark v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 8:55 am
Clark. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Gore Does Not Suck Buckley is Dead, Long Live Buckley: The New Campaign Finance Incoherence of McConnell v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:18 pm
McConnell & Richard A. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
This appears to be why Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reconvened the Senate on May 4, despite Monahan’s warnings. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
” In Brown, and then emphatically in Loving v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
True, originalist scholars sometimes look to post-ratification materials for insight into the original public meaning (McConnell, for instance). [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
