Search for: "CLOSE v. COATES"
Results 101 - 120
of 281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2017, 2:03 pm
The local independent oil men had never catered to Baker & Botts; they always thought it was too close to the big oil companies and Eastern finance. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Jeffrey Smith v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
Kenwood had its own established goodwill in kitchen appliances and did not need to ride on Whirlpool's coat-tails. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:45 pm
It is wholly integrated into the coat and should not prevent the coat from originating in Mexico. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:12 am
Pennsylvania Coat of ArmsOriginally found compensable by a workers' compensation judge, then reversed by the Appeals Board, the state Commonwealth Court agreed with the original ruling finding compensability.The case is O'Rourke v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 7:41 pm
The Sixth Circuit court of appeals, in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:31 am
General EU – India agreement in WTO dispute raises bar for EU drug seizures (IP Watch) EU: CJEU rules on repackaging of pharma goods: Joined Cases C-400/09 and C-207/10 Orifarm and Paranova v Merck Sharp Dohme (Class 46) (IPKat) EU: Ophtal v Oftal Cusi- General Court upholds finding of no likelihood of confusion for identical goods in T-160/09 (Class 46) EU: The holiday is over: a close reading of the opinion in Medeva: Joined Cases C? [read post]
28 May 2008, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Admittedly, only one fellow employee identified the appellant as the burglar on the basis of the suspect coat. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 5:25 am
Admittedly, only one fellow employee identified the appellant as the burglar on the basis of the suspect coat. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:09 pm
The ruling follows closely on a wider-reaching blistering decision by Hawaii-based U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
See Johnson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:23 am
The Court of Appeals' decision came in the case of Ashanti Cost v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:38 am
Barring an appeal to the California Supreme Court, the Ninth Circuit’s decision brings this dolphin tale to a close. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
In California v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Shanks v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
The latest is Case T 581/13 Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club v OHIM - Lifestyle Equities (Royal County of Berkshire POLO CLUB), a decision rendered last Thursday by the General Court of the European Union in another POLO-related dispute, this time involving a Community trade mark (CTM) application [it seems to this Kat that the word "polo" has the same effect on brand owners as catnip has on cats -- its appeal is irresistible]. [read post]
