Search for: "COFFER v. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am
Circuit’s unanimous en banc opinion in SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:05 am
It was the subject of Edwards v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
Booth v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:54 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Florida v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am
What the American people want is an economy that doesn’t feel like the United States of Quicksand. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 12:49 am
Interestingly, Nollan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:47 am
Via Corporate Law Report- Unanimous Supreme Court Decision Supports Hydropower Industry and Private Landowners (K&L Gates LLP)“The United States Supreme Court gave the hydropower industry a major victory last week in the closely watched case of PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:04 am
The amendment process under Article V has followed a meandering path — in fact, the latest amendment, the 27th, dealing with congressional salaries and ratified in 1992, was actually one of the first proposed, in 1789. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:32 pm
Stone v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:06 am
(Marek v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:30 pm
Book clubs may be passe, but empty state coffers are current news. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:29 am
Plaintiffs’ counsel could feel safe putting “their” money into the coffers of SKAPP, which was openly committed to undermining the implementation of evidence-based standards for causation opinion testimony in federal and state courts. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:43 pm
Most recently, in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
District Court, District of Arizona (Phoenix); appellate case, Cervantes v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 8:48 pm
In Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 10:01 am
Professor Buchanan cites Perry v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 10:22 pm
Justus et al v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
If they began to out-spend their subsidized opponents, every dollar they spent would be matched by a subsidy dollar dropped into their opponents’ coffers. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:39 am
U.S. v. [read post]
