Search for: "CONWAY v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Nasrallah v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
As Neal Katyal and George Conway have argued, a number of senators who are considering what procedures to follow in this impeachment—and whether to call witnesses—are lawyers who should understand basic principles of the justice system. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Feeney J effectively held that the plaintiff was entitled to ordinary compensatory damages, but he failed to appreciate that such damages include damages for distress (Conway v Ireland [1991] 2 IR 305, 317, [1991] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ; Griffin J and McCarthy JJ concurring); Shortt v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2007] 4 IR 587, 612, [2007] IESC 9 (21 March 2007) [82] (Murray CJ), [2007] 4 IR 587, 648, [2007] IESC 9 [223]… [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian considers how surveillance companies are assisting in state surveillance mandates. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
And recent assertions, particularly the OLC opinion concluding that Conway is immune from testimony about her public appearances implicating the Hatch Act, have pushed the doctrine beyond its historical scope. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 6:01 pm by Marty Lederman
  And several Justices of the Supreme Court--sometimes even a majority--will, in at least some important cases (e.g., Trump v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:53 am by Vishnu Kannan
Circuit’s decision in Qassim v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
Michael Conway, who served as counsel on the House judiciary committee during the Watergate investigation, has advanced a similar argument. [read post]