Search for: "COOPER v. GIBSON" Results 61 - 80 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Gibson Dunn also expects the Supreme Court to enter the debate over Rule 23. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
District Court Judge Judith Gibson says they first problem is that “vulgar abuse is not defamatory,” so the proposed new defamation scheme that requires social media platforms to hand over the identity of anonymous commenters to potential defamation claimants is fundamentally flawed. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 2:51 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Notably, advocates of this approach have been vague as to methods and criteria for areas warranting closure – an indication that those issues are difficult to surmount.[10] There are two obvious problems with this, the first of which is that removing access to these capabilities frustrates all uses, good, bad and neutral, and the second of which is that it is not technically possible, at least not without the cooperation of Internet service providers in those regions. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Becerra; and the Colorado baker gay-marriage case, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Considine, Mark Cooley, Frank Cooney, Ivor Coons, Michael Cooper, Samuel P. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Khuzami also outlined organizational changes under consideration with a focus on making the Enforcement Division more “strategic, swift, smart and successful,” including: • creating specialized groups of attorneys along product, market or transactional lines and increasing collaboration among staff across regions; • flattening the management structure of the Division and reducing the… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
The detective’s statements during questioning that he did not believe the juvenile was telling the entire truth and that this was the juvenile’s last opportunity to cooperate were not coercive and did not alter this conclusion. [read post]