Search for: "COVIDIEN, LP"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2023, 10:20 am
Covidien LP, 812 F.3d 1023, 1034 (Fed. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:15 am
Covidien LP, 812 F.3d 1023, 1031–32 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:46 pm
Covidien LP, 812 F.3d 1023, 1034 (Fed. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
Mesh Lawsuits we are not reviewing: Hernia mesh we are not reviewing for hernia mesh victims: AlloMax Mylar Strattice Surgisis Xen-Matrix FlexHD Mersilene Physiomesh open Prolene Vicryl vicryl Mesh Bag XCM Alloderm Allograft Surgimesh WN Surgimesh XB Bio-A Hernia plug Mycromesh Soft Tissue Patch Tigr Matrix Veritas Collagen Matrix BioDesign Sugisis Gold Surgimend Fortiva Matristem MotifMesh Vitamesh Vitamesh Blue Hermesh Hertra Optilene Optilene LP Optilene Mesh Elastic Premilene Dynamesh… [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court ruling denying a request for declaratory judgment by Covidien LP and Covidien Holding Inc. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:15 am
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a district court ruling denying a request for declaratory judgment by Covidien LP and Covidien Holding Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 4:50 pm
Covidien LP, 812F.3d 1023, 1031–32 (Fed. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:50 am
Covidien LP v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:43 pm
According to DOJ’s press release: Covidien LP has agreed to pay $17,477,947 to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by providing free or discounted practice development and market development support to physicians located in California and Florida to induce purchases of Covidien’s vein ablation products, the Department of Justice announced today. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
And also see Covidien LP v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 3:53 am
Covidien LP, whose parent acquired ev3, separately paid $13 million to resolve False Claims Act allegations resulting from its alleged payment of kickbacks in connection with another medical device, the Solitaire mechanical thrombectomy device. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:31 am
Patent No. 8,061,359, which is owned by Appellees Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Covidien LP (together, “S&N”). [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
Covidien LP et al, 1-16-cv-12556 (MAD October 2, 2017, Order) (Sorokin, MJ) [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 am
Covidien LP, et al., No. 16-366 (separation-of-function – can the PTO Director delegate IPR institution decisions to PTAB); Same question presented in LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
The case, Covidien LP v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:25 pm
”[4] Of interest though, in the order to show cause, the court suggests that it might keep the case in the “interest of justice” rather than transfer it. [5][federalcircuitjurisdictionorder] = = = = [1] See Covidien LP v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 10:10 am
Covidien LP, 812 F.3d 1023 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
Covidien LP, et al., No. 16-366 (separation-of-function – can the PTO Director delegate IPR institution decisions to PTAB); Same question presented in LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am
Covidien LP, et al., No. 16-366 (separation-of-function – can the PTO Director delegate IPR institution decisions to PTAB); Same question presented in LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:12 pm
Covidien LP 16-366 Issue: Whether the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act permits the Patent Trial and Appeal Board instead of the Director to make inter partes review institution decisions. [read post]
