Search for: "CP v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2008, 2:03 am
R (Raissi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 72; [2008] WLR (D) 49 “The court was entitled to decide the meaning of a ministerial policy introducing an ex gratia compensation scheme. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:13 pm
NMCCA has issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:15 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
If a drug company, in 1995, marketed antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) for the prevention of cerebral palsy (CP) in the United States, the government might well have prosecuted the company for misbranding. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:19 am
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:32 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 7:57 am
” The updated guidance states that the CPS considers that it is possible to charge a person under s330 POCA even where there is insufficient evidence to establish that money laundering was planned or has taken place[1]. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:24 pm
In Camreta and Alford v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
In Camreta and Alford v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:52 am
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals decided United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
The 7th Circuit held that a female custodian employed by Chicago Public Schools (CPS) failed to state a valid claim for... [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:30 am
CareFlite Accessing an Employee’s Facebook Posts by “Shoulder Surfing” a Coworker’s Page States Privacy Claim — Ehling v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
This has recently been developed from an understanding of the right as being a relatively narrow one, which is to do with receiving information that others are willing to impart (found in Leander v Sweden (1987) EHRR 43), to a relatively broad one, which now encompasses receiving information held by an organ of the state, free of unjustified administrative obstacles (found in Tarsasag a Szabadsagjogokert v Hungary (2009) ECHR 618 and Kenedi v Hungary (2009) ECHR… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Blondin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:34 pm
In Estelle v Smith (451 US 454 [1981]) the United States Supreme Court considered when the questioning by a person who is not a law enforcement officer is subject to the requirements of Miranda. [read post]
The Mendiola Decision: When Sleeping on the Job and Personal Time Is Still Part of an Employee’s Job
13 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
However, the state minimum wage requirements in each of the wage orders do apply, and so the California Supreme Court’s new Mendiola v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:54 am
CP Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
