Search for: "CRASH DUMMY V MATTEL" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rooklidge defended Mattel in a trademark challengebrought by The Crash Dummy Movie, LLC. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 8:34 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rooklidge defended Mattel in a trademark challengebrought by The Crash Dummy Movie, LLC. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 3:02 am by John L. Welch
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral argument [mp3 here] in an appeal from the TTAB's decision in Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 1:32 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from... [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 4:15 am
The Crash Dummies Movie, LLC, Opposition No. 91159002 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of CRASH DUMMIES for action figures and other toys, in view of Opposer's alleged prior use of CRASH DUMMIES and THE INCREDIBLE CRASH DUMMIES for action figures and playsets].June 25, 2008 - 2 PM: In re Brunswick Corp., Serial No. 78875524 [Refusal of AQUAPALOOZA for boats and structural parts therefor for failure to submit proper… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
: District Court Delaware dismisses lawsuit by Pernod Ricard against Bacardi (IP tango)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC affirms TTAB’s CRASH DUMMIES no abandonment decision: Mattel, Inc v The Crash Dummy Movie (TTABlog) TTAB precedential no 14: Noncommercial use defense to a dilution claim unavailable in a TTAB proceeding: American Express Marketing & Development Corp v Gilad Development Corporation (TTABlog) TTAB… [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46)   Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP)   Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]