Search for: "CROWN CORK AND SEAL INC"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 5:22 am
The full citations of the two cases are IBM United Kingdom Ltd v LzLabs GmbH & Others [2024] EWHC 423 (TCC) (28 February 2024) and Crown Cork & Seal Co Inc & Another v Rheem South Africa (Pty) Ltd & Others 1980 (3) SA 1093 (W). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:46 am
Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:39 am
Some of the most notable asbestos companies include: Abex Corporation Armstrong World Industries Babcock, Wilcox & Company Bell Asbestos Mines CertainTeed Corporation Congoleum Corporation Crown Cork & Seal General Aniline and Film (GAF) Corporation Georgia Pacific General Electric Harbison-Walker Refractories Company Honeywell Heating Specialty Co. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
In 1983, the Court clarified in Crown, Cork & Seal Co. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 7:43 am
Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
That case (and the 1983 decision in Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc. v Parker) considered the effect of a failed class action on later filings by the individuals who would have been members of a class if the class action had succeeded. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:54 am
Utah, 414 U.S. 538 (1974), and Crown Cork & Seal v. [read post]
1 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
Nearly a decade later, in Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
" Crown, Cork & Seal, 462 U.S. at 350-51. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
" Crown, Cork & Seal, 462 U.S. at 350-51. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 1220, 1239 ["Negligence and strict products liability are separate and distinct bases for liability that do not automatically collapse into each other because the plaintiff might allege both when a product warning contributes to her injury"].)We likewise discount decisions from those jurisdictions that differ from California by categorically excluding from liability certain defendants (see, e.g.,… [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Partner, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Partner, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:28 am
It was undisputed on appeal that the earlier class actions were timely and that American Pipe and Crown, Cork & Seal tolled the statute of limitations for the individual claims of would-be class members. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:16 am
Quoting Crown, Cork & Seal (U.S. 1983), they note that the limitations period is intended to put defendants on notice of adverse claims and prevent plaintiffs from sleeping on their rights—ends that are met when a class action is commenced. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:46 am
Under the Supreme Court’s rulings in American Pipe & Construction Co. v Utah and Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v Parker, the filing of a class action tolls the statute of limitations for all asserted members of the class, explained the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:56 am
Crown Cork & Seal Canada Inc. [2] In Girling, the Court of Appeal had expressly rejected the argument that retirement benefits must be deducted from an award of damages. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:48 pm
See Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
But there was no Swiss company “Crown Cork & Seal CO” registered at the address indicated in the notice of appeal, which was the correct address of the “Crown Cork AG” company. [read post]
