Search for: "Cable v State of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2019, 1:51 pm by Howard Wasserman
Halleck, SCOTUS held that the private non-profit corporation designated by New York City to manage state-required public-access cable channels was not a state actor, so not subject to First Amendment limitations in banning a speaker from the channels. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Facts of Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck New York state law requires cable operators to set aside channels on their cable systems for public access. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:15 am by Patricia Salkin
” Preservation of Wainscott, Inc. v New York State Public Service Commission, 2023 NY Slip Op 02510 (2d Dept. 5/10/23). [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:26 pm by Phil Cave
Perhaps this will be attached to the bill board located on New York Ave., DC. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 9:14 am
CGL - ADDITIONAL INSURED - DUTY TO DEFENDTime Warner Cable of New York City v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
TWC is the second-largest cable provider in the United States, and the market leader in many places, such as in the areas of New York City in which TWC is the franchisee. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 9:58 am by Barry Barnett
Blawgletter's friend Sam Simon asked us to visit this morning with the Class Action Committee of the New York State Bar's Antitrust Section, and the chair -- whom we also count as a friend -- Hollis Salzman gave her okay. [read post]
Supreme Court struck down a New York City regulation requiring Loretto allow the installation of a small cable TV box on the roof of her apartment building. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:25 am by Eric Turkewitz
-Time-WarnerDownload Tweet The post New York Judge Orders Virtual Depositions Due to COVID-19 appeared first on New York Personal Injury Law Blog. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm by JakeMcGowan
A district court in New York encountered such a situation in DISH Network v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 10:22 am by Patricia Salkin
Initially, Kinsella moved for a temporary restraining order in the District Court for the District of Columbia, but his case was transferred to the District Court for the Eastern District of New York based on the location of the project and because there was already another similar case pending in the Eastern District of New York, Mahoney v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
An Illinois federal district court has granted conditional collective certification of an independent contractor misclassification claim by cable technicians, who claim that Elite Engineering, Inc. violated the wage and hour provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the law of Missouri, New York, Ohio and Wisconsin. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:00 am
Louis.Journalists and government officials have suggested that either WikiLeaks or The New York Times (NYT) might face legal liability for publishing the contents of diplomatic cables and other leaked documents. [read post]