Search for: "Calhoun v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2013, 9:32 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Justice Sotomayor issued a statement, joined by Justice Breyer, concurring in the Court's decision not to grant cert in Calhoun v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:44 pm by Bridget Crawford
United States Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall cited her book, States’ Laws on Race and Color, for its influence on the lawyers fighting segregation laws. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:19 am by Michael DelSignore
 On April 1, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the case of Maurice Walker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, engineered largely by Henry Clay, temporarily settled the issue of where slavery would be permitted in the United States, establishing the Mason-Dixon Line as the boundary between free and slave states. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:48 am by Brian Shiffrin
For example, this week, in a statement regarding the denial of certiorari in  Calhoun v United States (568 US __ [2/25/13]), Justices Sotomayor and Breyer condemned the racial  argument of the Assistant United States Attorney,  but did not name the attorney:It is deeply disappointing to see a representative of theUnited States resort to this base tactic more than a decade into the 21st century. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Steven Boutwell
  The law expressly provides, however, that Act No. 5 “shall apply to all taxable periods beginning on or after the date of the final ruling of the United States Supreme Court in [South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:40 am by Kent Scheidegger
Senator John Chafee of Rhode Island named his son Lincoln, but maybe he should have named him Calhoun, after the South Carolina leader who believed states could nullify federal laws. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Will Baude
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630; Jackson, J., dissenting in Beauharnais v. [read post]