Search for: "Calhoun v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2013, 2:09 pm
Writing in a "Statement" accompanying the denial of certiorari in Calhoun v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:32 am
Justice Sotomayor issued a statement, joined by Justice Breyer, concurring in the Court's decision not to grant cert in Calhoun v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:44 pm
United States Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall cited her book, States’ Laws on Race and Color, for its influence on the lawyers fighting segregation laws. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:37 am
Today, as CNN reported, the United States Supreme Court rejected cert in the case Bogani Charles Calhoun v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 2:19 am
On April 1, 2019, the Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for a writ of certiorari filed in the case of Maurice Walker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, engineered largely by Henry Clay, temporarily settled the issue of where slavery would be permitted in the United States, establishing the Mason-Dixon Line as the boundary between free and slave states. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 10:48 am
United States (docket 12-6142). [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
From United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:48 am
For example, this week, in a statement regarding the denial of certiorari in Calhoun v United States (568 US __ [2/25/13]), Justices Sotomayor and Breyer condemned the racial argument of the Assistant United States Attorney, but did not name the attorney:It is deeply disappointing to see a representative of theUnited States resort to this base tactic more than a decade into the 21st century. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:29 am
The United State Supreme Court disagreed, holding the plain language of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
Case citation: United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
The law expressly provides, however, that Act No. 5 “shall apply to all taxable periods beginning on or after the date of the final ruling of the United States Supreme Court in [South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:40 am
Senator John Chafee of Rhode Island named his son Lincoln, but maybe he should have named him Calhoun, after the South Carolina leader who believed states could nullify federal laws. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 2:20 pm
Calhoun, Jason R. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 2:52 pm
USA v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:14 am
United States, 2012 U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630; Jackson, J., dissenting in Beauharnais v. [read post]
