Search for: "California v. Lord" Results 1 - 20 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am by Jonathan Glasson QC
Damages for recovery of the costs of surrogacy On 1 April 2020, Lord Reed announced by video link the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14, on appeal from [2018] EWCA Civ 2832. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
  Nonetheless, because a case from the California Supreme Court forty years ago held the contrary, the court elects to follow that precedent and let the appeal go forward.Justice Kennard makes a pretty good argument for going the other way, albeit solely prospectively. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 12:15 am
Section 2105 of the California Corporations Code prohibits a foreign corporation from transacting intrastate business in California without having first registered with the California Secretary of State. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he raises two sentencing issues. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:06 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” USC notes that one of the earliest recorded white collar crimes concerned an importer who, after taking out a loan to acquire goods for sale, planned to fake a shipwreck and make off with the goods and money.Another such scheme was the genesis of the ruling of the Lord Chief Justice, the 1st Earl of Mansfield [William Murray], in the Zone case [Gregson v Gilbert (1783) 3 Doug. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:51 am by Rick
” Better Courts Now complains that Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
On 29 October 2018 Lord Speaker Lord Fowler issued a statement on parliamentary privilege. [read post]