Search for: "California v. Super. Ct."
Results 241 - 260
of 497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Super. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
It resulted here, in my view, in losing a motion -- in a high-value case, no less -- that should have been won.Second, more generally, even if you're a super good lawyer, know your respective lane. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 2:40 pm
Ct. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
Super. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm
Super. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Super. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:04 am
Ct. at 1613. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 12:05 pm
Super. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
Ct. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
Ct. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 12:03 pm
Ct. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:30 am
Super. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:08 pm
Super. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:46 am
Super. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:20 pm
Super. [read post]
12 May 2009, 1:40 am
Ct.). [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm
Substantially so.The statute at issue -- the California Voting Rights Act -- says that a plaintiff has to establish five elements to obtain relief under the statute: 1. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Super. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Super. [read post]
