Search for: "Callaghan v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 85
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
Plaintiff put forth sufficient detail to establish the negligence of the attorneys, that the negligence was the proximate cause of the losses sustained by the benefits funds, and actual damages to those funds (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; O'Callaghan v Brunelle, 84 AD3d 581, 582 [2011]). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:11 am
Since damages in a legal malpractice case are designed “to make the injured client whole” (Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990]), having failed to plead actual damages, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim (see Heritage Partners, LLC v Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 133 AD3d 428 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 27 NY3d 904 [2016]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:06 am
Yesterday Pangloss was very happy to have a guest lecture for her Internet Law class given by Trevor Callaghan, Managing Product Counsel of Google UK. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:01 pm
Serv. 3d (Callaghan) 661; 20 Fla. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:52 pm
In this regard, O’Callaghan J cited Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union[1] with approval. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 5:19 am
" Callaghan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
As for his first personal injury action against the City, the MTA, and related parties, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for malpractice since defendants successfully negotiated [*2]a settlement on his behalf despite an adverse finding by the WCB. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:40 am
In the case of Smith v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
S. 244 (1888); and Callaghan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
S. 244 (1888); and Callaghan v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 6:28 am
New York: Clark Boardman Callaghan/West Group.Green, Bruce A. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 4:22 pm
He held that the less cogent the evidence needed to satisfy the standard, (see Callaghan v Independent News & Media Limited [2008] NIQB 15 at [17] which is an aspect of the precautionary principle see Jordan’s Applications [2014] NIQB 11 at [118])([35]). [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 5:27 am
The case is Callaghan v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:30 am
The facts in Callaghan v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 8:19 am
Meanwhile, in a similar failure to hire case, a Rhode Island trial court ruled in Callaghan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 1:19 pm
The third was a companion case to Banks, Callaghan v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 5:06 pm
” It also pointed out that, when it comes to the use of medical marijuana, “Congress seems to want, as Justice Brandeis said, the States to be the laboratories of democracy” (Callaghan v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
See Kashelkar v. [read post]
