Search for: "Camara v. Municipal Court" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2021, 5:03 am by SHG
Third, the district court applied the wrong law when it relied on Brown v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am by admin
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1963). [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 9:20 pm by Patricia Salkin
Further the court stated that to the extent plaintiff alleged an unconstitutional search of her property, the court cited the United States Supreme Court decision in Camara v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 9:20 pm by Patricia Salkin
Further the court stated that to the extent plaintiff alleged an unconstitutional search of her property, the court cited the United States Supreme Court decision in Camara v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
  Although Frank was overturned just eight years later by Camara v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967). [read post]