Search for: "Campbell v. England"
Results 1 - 20
of 141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 4:20 pm
Privacy law at the time was at a crucial inflection point in England and Wales. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 11:13 pm
We have England v South Africa rugby to look forward to this weekend. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 3:33 am
Author Basher Eyre Licence CC BY-SA 2.0 Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Campbell Forsyth) Safestand Ltd v Weston Homes Plc and others [2023] EWHC 1098 (Pat) (10 May 2023)A fundamental principle of civil litigation in England and Wales is that each party discloses to the other(s) any and all documents in his or her possession, custody or control that relate(s) to an issue in [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:25 pm
In Bukovsky v Crown Prosecution Service ([2016] EWHC 1926 (QB)), a Soviet dissident resident in England, was suing the Crown Prosecution Service (‘CPS’), the principal public prosecuting authority in England and Wales, for libel, misfeasance in public office, and breach of the Human Rights Act concerning a press release announcing that he was to be prosecuted for a number of criminal offences. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:46 am
That was the issue in a recent case called Campbell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:18 pm
He noted that “one facet of the public interest can be correcting a false image, referring to the PCC Code and to Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [65]. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:56 am
Tugendhat J first referred back to Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 WLR 1232 where Lord Nicholls established that breach of confidence was better encapsulated by another concept, that of misuse of private information, and commented that the tort, however labelled, “affords respect for one aspect of an individual’s privacy”. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 3:45 pm
" "Since the decision of the Victorian Court of Appeal in R v Campbell ([1997] 2 VR 585), an accused is reckless if they know that a particular harmful consequence will probably result from their action but they proceed regardless. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
” In Von Hannover v Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1 the European Court of Human Rights exposed the flaw in the A v B approach: 63. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
And it is a decade now since the seminal decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
He noted that “one facet of the public interest can be correcting a false image, referring to the PCC Code and to Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [65]. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm
Until recently it could safely be said there was no “right to privacy” in the law of England and Wales. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
England, 385 U.S. 99, 100-01 (1966). [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:22 pm
Campbell (Wills and Trusts - Osage Headrights)Seminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:49 pm
Medical information would almost certainly pass this threshold (see: Campbell v MGN). [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
No, just a glass-- but beer's best tasted in glass that's waisted" (here), soon-to-be-guest-Kat Darren Meale provided us with a commentary on the design law issues arising from Utopia Tableware v BBP Marketing Ltd [2013] EWHC 3483, a decision of Mr Recorder Douglas Campbell sitting as an Enterprise Judge in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (IPEC) for England and Wales. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
ChatGPT gave the best list Campbell v. [read post]
