Search for: "Care and Protection of M.C."
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2024, 6:07 pm
District Court for Idaho held that Idaho’s “Vulnerable Child Protection Act” was an unconstitutional impediment to the freedoms of both parents and their children to choose gender affirming care even though, technically, the crime can only be committed by health care professionals who provide treatment. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
(Minor Child), Child in Need of Services, and M.C. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 10:44 am
Photo by Anne R on Pexels.comBy: Trent M.C. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Court Upholds Removal of Child From Parents, Related to Child's Transgender Identity
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm
., decided today by the Indiana Court of Appeals (Judge Terry Crone, joined by Judges Nancy Vaidik and Robert Altice): M.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 6:02 pm
Lauderdale, FL)Where Your Family Comes First (M.C. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 8:09 am
Mary Glenn operated group homes in Las Vegas under the name M.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 8:51 am
M.C. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 10:11 am
Ten months after that, the biological mother cut off visits between M.C. and the child. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:09 am
M.C. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:19 am
TSDR 5355797 CHALLENGER GLOVES TSDR 5355785 AVID RAIL SYSTEM TSDR 5355778 DIGIJUMP TSDR 5355712 COMPASSIONATE CAREGIVERS TSDR 5352957 SYSTEMATICA TSDR 5352948 KALI BEAUTY TSDR 5355685 CENTERPOINT TSDR 5355570 PROTECTING PATIENTS BY ANTICIPATING CARE TSDR 5355325 RHAPSODY TSDR 5355312 TRACK TECHNOLOGY TSDR 5351306 BOSS CHICK ADDICTED TO LIPSTICK TSDR 5351272 TANNER’S CREEK TSDR 5348532 HS TSDR 5351203 VITALITY ACTIVE REWARDS TSDR 5351127 KLIPSCH TSDR 5351068 LUSTER TSDR… [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:46 am
The court of appeals noted that while property owners have a responsibility to exercise care in protecting their patrons, they do not have a responsibility to remove or avoid conditions when they could not have anticipated that any risk of harm would arise, or when they could not have discovered the dangerous condition. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
M.C. v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 8:30 am
This modified section allows Courts to place the interest of the children first by giving them the authority to protect children from the emotional and psychological impact of being separated from one of his or her parents. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm
1-Be very careful about taking seemingly harsh action against employees for seemingly petty rule violations, especially when the employee is in some type of legally protected status. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 1:58 pm
1-Be very careful about taking seemingly harsh action against employees for seemingly petty rule violations, especially when the employee is in some type of legally protected status. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 11:39 am
Cases involving unemancipated children are assigned to certain matrimonial parts and are subject to stringent review to protect the rights of the children. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
(These rights are fiercely protected by the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
In January, on a 6-2 decision, the Supreme Court held that Congress had the right to enter into the 1994 Uruguay Round Agreement This was an international treaty that, in part, allowed foreign rights-holders to claim copyright protection on some works that were previously in the public domain. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:45 am
So there’s a threshold interdependence between the two that poses conceptual problems (sort of a regulatory equivalent to M.C. [read post]
