Search for: "Cargill, Inc. v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
A majority of fed cattle in the United States are sold to packing plants and processed into various beef products. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
Contaminated pork also accounts for numerous foodborne Salmonella infections in the United States.[5] The 2015 annual report on foodborne illnesses in the U.S., published by CDC, revealed that pork meat was the second most important source of foodborne Salmonella outbreaks.[6] In pork meat, pigs and swine, and the swine farm environment, the prevalence of Salmonella is 39.6%, 17.7%, and 7.9%, respectively.[7] Cargill, Inc., the largest private corporation in the… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm by Zach ZhenHe Tan
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:18 am by Wolfgang Demino
 LUCINDA VINE; KRISTY POND, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.PLS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; PLS LOAN STORE OF TEXAS, INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants.No. 16-50847.United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.Filed May 19, 2017.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, USDC No. 3:16-CV-31.Before: BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.PER CURIAM.[*]Appellants PLS Financial Services, Inc., and PLS Loan… [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
” The question is whether the “personal injury” language from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 6:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“Watson”) appeals the final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that claim 4 of U.S. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Nestle USA Inc., Archer Daniels Midland Co., Cargill Incorporated Co., and Cargill Cocoa did not own cocoa farms but, according to the plaintiffs, they maintained and protected a steady supply of cocoa through exclusive buyer/seller relationships with Ivorian farms, and imported most of the Ivory Coast’s cocoa harvest to the United States. [read post]