Search for: "Carlos Cancel v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Anglofile counterclaimed for cancellation of SBM's registrations, maintaining that both marks contained the geographical term "Monte-Carlo" and that the Casino de Monte-Carlo mark also contained the purely descriptive word "casino". [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Lawrence (Attorney Fees) Gila River Indian Community, and San Carlos Apache Tribe v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am by Nedim Malovic
The applicant thus appealed to the EUIPO Second Board of Appeal (the Board), which annulled the Cancellation Division’s decision in its entirety and dismissed the application for a declaration of invalidity. [read post]
24 May 2012, 10:06 am by Jill Family
In these consolidated cases, two foreign nationals, Carlos Martinez Gutierrez and Damien Antonio Sawyers, applied for cancellation of removal. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 8:06 am by Jill Family
Carlos Martinez Gutierrez arrived in the United States with his parents when he was five years old. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:13 am by Amy Howe
The justices handed the federal government a partial victory today in Azar v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm
A registry will be created by IMPI with the aim of recognizing GIs and AOs protected abroad, in accordance with the international treaties and the provisions established in Chapter V. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology Michelle Donelan has refuted a reported pause on consideration of the proposed Data Protection and Digital Information Bill. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
  The first respondent, Carlos Gutierrez, came to the United States when he was five and became a lawful permanent resident (which, as the name suggests, allows him to stay in the United States as long as he doesn’t get into trouble with the law) when he was nineteen. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
Judge Carlos Bea dissented in part, arguing that the use of deadly force in the circumstances was reasonable. [read post]