Search for: "Carpenter v. Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 3:02 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dean & Dean Solicitors v Dionissiou -Moussaoui [2011] EWCA Civ 1331 (17 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Vinall & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 6252 (16 November 2011) Carpenter, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 2568 (11 November 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Glenn & Co (Essex) Ltd & Ors v HM Commissioners for Revenue and Customs & Anor [2011] EWHC 2998 (Admin) (16 November 2011)… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:23 am
Accordingly, said the Court of Appeals, “we cannot conclude that the penalty of dismissal imposed . . . shocks the judicial conscience as a matter of law,” citing a number of decisions, including Matter of Will v Frontier Central School District Board. of Education. 97 NY2d 690, and Matter of Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222.The court observed that: “The Appellate Division has no discretionary authority or interest of justice jurisdiction in this Article 78… [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:09 am by admin
Shulman, the Court declined to change its earlier decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:45 am
 Both Justice Marshall and Justice Blackmun (joined by Justice White) wrote dissents to what I believe is Justice Powell’s first opinion, see Commissioner v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 4:19 pm by The Law Blogger
Last August, we blogged about the most recent such case: Carpenter v United States.Carpenter was summarized in our post:Tim Carpenter was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan for a series of armed robberies in Detroit and across Northern Ohio. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:01 pm by James F. Aspell
The Connecticut Appellate Court released it's decison on December 1, 2009 in the case of MARJORIE VORONUK v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 am by Dale Carpenter
On the other hand, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Hurley v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Additionally, the court referred to a landmark Supreme Court case, Carpenter v United States,[3] and noted that the purpose of the Fourth Amendment was to safeguard privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm
Commissioner of Social Security New York Social Security Ruling Underscores Importance of Treating Physician Testimony: Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 2:55 pm
Media/tech/culture/etc Lawrence Lessig, Code v 2.0 (replacing PDF) Graham Fraser, Sorry, I Don’t Speak French (out last year in Canada, now in PB and Fraser has since become Official Languages Commissioner!) [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Habibullah, American International University, Bangladesh Your Spying Smart Phone: Individual Privacy Is Narrowly Strengthened in Carpenter v. [read post]