Search for: "Carr v. Carr" Results 121 - 140 of 1,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 5:33 am
Basher Eyre / Junction of Fetter Lane and Rolls Buildings / CC BY-SA 2.0 Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Henry Carr) TQ Delta, LLC v ZYXEL Communications Ltd and another [2019] EWHC 562 (Pat) (11 March 2019) This was a patent infringement action. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 3:05 am by Brian Cordery
Brian Corderyby Elizabeth McAuliffe At a Form of Order hearing on 18 March 2019, Henry Carr J gave a high level ex tempore decision in TQ Delta LLC v ZyXEL Communications Limited et al to grant an injunction, with immediate effect. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:19 am
Mr Justice Carr noted that the Practice Statement represents an important change to the management of patent cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 1:23 am
 Mr Justice Carr interpreted this as covering the deletion of mouse sequences of at least one V segment and all the D and J segments (>100 kb) and the insertion of the equivalent human regions (>75kb). [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm by Sme
City of Wichita (10th Cir., June 1, 2018) (affirming judgment in favor of Wichita on McDonald's retaliation claim: the jury was properly instructed on the legal standard for retaliation)Workers Compensation/Occupational Safety and Disease*Carr v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:16 pm by INFORRM
In Brand & Anor v Szilvia (aka Sylvie) Berki [2014] EWHC 2979 (QB) (11 September 2014) Mrs Justice Carr outlined the thresholds necessary for a successful application for an “anti-harassment” injunction. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:47 pm by Brian Shiffrin
A reminder: In 1986 the Court of Appeals held that a party seeking a missing witness instruction has the burden of making the request "as soon as practicable" (People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428 [1986]). [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:54 pm by Corey Rayburn Yung
My prediction is a big loss for Carr on the statutory interpretation issue. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:54 pm by Corey Rayburn Yung
My prediction is a big loss for Carr on the statutory interpretation issue. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:19 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 2009, Dabney Carr wrote:Exergen echoes the Supreme Court’s decisions in Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Peter Mahler
Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s ruling last week in Carr v Global Payments Inc. [read post]