Search for: "Carr v. State of California"
Results 81 - 100
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition for respondent Hardin County Brief in opposition for respondent Savannah Police Department Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1301 Title: Carr v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am
Carr (1962), recognizing judicial review of legislative apportionment; Engel v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Carr, it fared poorly on the cert. docket: the Court won’t review Kansas v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:01 am
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr explained: “Most importantly, the court affirmed our decision that parties cannot demand upfront fees before reviewing any cell sites, large or small. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
Donelan has ditched the previous Secretary of State’s inflated claims that the DPDI Bill saved over £1 billion. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:51 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:17 am
The NTIA Broadband USA main page features a state-by-state summary of state broadband programs (scroll down to the map and click on a state). [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:57 am
In support of their motion, Defendants state as follows: [1.] [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
As of the time of trial, the state of the art did not include a genetic marker for SJS/TEN. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 9:48 am
So long as responsible, law-abiding adults may purchase handguns in California, the First Amendment prevents the State from enforcing Section 26820’s ban on on-site handgun advertising. [1] See Bigelow v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am
I understand how it happened, however, as it’s an easy mistake to make, thanks to the California State Bar’s ongoing refusal to make clear what California’s “new” law prohibits and what it allows. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
Carr] and Reynolds [v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 11:06 am
V. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
