Search for: "Carr v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 379
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 6:30 am
But suppose that the Supreme Court of the United States were to declare the United States as the de facto or de jure sovereign over Iraq on account of the occupation of US troops. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:53 pm
But in Boyle v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:22 am
Carr to determine the existence of a nonjusticiable political question. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
He is not a state. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm
United States The Federal Trade Commission voted to approve a fine of roughly [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
Article I, Section 10 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:00 am
” Citing Carr v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:40 am
” Perez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Carr, it fared poorly on the cert. docket: the Court won’t review Kansas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:29 pm
Omnipharm - represented by the dynamic duo that is Henry Carr QC (11 South Square) and Tom Mitcheson (3 New Square) - unsurprisingly said that the judge was correct on insufficiency. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:04 pm
United States. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:41 pm
This trend has included some pulling back from the near-per-se invalidation of discriminatory state laws under the Dormant Commerce Clause, most recently in United Haulers Ass’n v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
India Kerala has become the first state in India to distribute drone surveillance systems to all of its policing districts. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:29 am
City of New York, New York and United States v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:56 am
”); Carr v. [read post]
