Search for: "Carr v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:23 am
North Country (2005) North Country chronicles the story of the first class-action sexual harassment lawsuit in the United States, Jenson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:51 pm
, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:42 am
Carr and Reynolds v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm
Carr. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 2:44 am
Carr (1962), recognizing judicial review of legislative apportionment; Engel v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 3:37 pm
Pa. 2008); United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:38 am
Carr that the federal courts could intervene in state voter reapportionment cases. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 9:12 am
” United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Bryan-Wollman v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:04 pm
United States. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
Mgt. v Spencer. [read post]
12 May 2017, 8:00 am
Carr and Wesberry v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am
Carr (collectively, Wooster petitioners) and Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc. commenced these CPLR article 78 proceedings seeking to annul the negative declaration issued by respondent City of Buffalo Planning Board under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) with respect to the proposed construction of Queen City Landing in Buffalo’s Outer Harbor area. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
Penny sketched out the facts of the FKB v AbbVie litigation in the UK and the finding of Henry Carr J that it was appropriate to grant declarations that a dosage regime for a biosimilar product would have been anticipated or obvious at the priority date of a granted patent in the circumstances. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
Carr J , whilst noting that it was no reflection on the solicitor who had originally given the statement, stated that he did not believe AbbVie's explanation for its decision to abandon the '656 patent because it was not credible given the context. [read post]
