Search for: "Carter v State of New York" Results 61 - 80 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm by Dan Markel
Summer 2012 (vol. 15, no. 4) Ex Ante Mistakes • Bad Paterno • Justice Precedent • York v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            In these two very different books, Keyssar and the New York Times journalist Jesse Wegman struggle with the common problem that Keyssar’s title captures so well: Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The BBC reports as does CNBC, the New York Times and Law360. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Julia Solomon-Strauss
In 2019, acting on behalf of a grand jury, New York County District Attorney Cy Vance served a subpoena on Mazars, USA, the president’s accounting firm, seeking various financial records. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
With the well-intentioned goal of providing the public with clear policies and mechanisms to facilitate reporting hate speech on social media, the New York State legislature enacted N.Y. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Here's the TOC:Ex AnteMistakes • Bad Paterno • Justice Precedent • York v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 1:53 pm
Accordingly, RSSL § 607-b (a) must be interpreted as written, applying only to "[a]ny member of the New York city employees' retirement system who is employed by the city of New York or by the New York city health and hospital corporation in the position of emergency medical technician or advanced emergency medical technician [ emphasis added ]. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The legal malpractice case is first dismissed:  “Plaintiff’s claim for legal malpractice in connection with an underlying settlement fails to state a cause of action in the absence of allegations that the “settlement . . . was effectively compelled by the mistakes of [defendant] counsel” (Bernstein v Oppenheim & Co., 160 AD2d 428, 430 [1st Dept 1990]) or the result of fraud or coercion (see Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1st Dept… [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 10:31 pm
Garre will argue for the FCC, and Carter G. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 31607 (ND NY, March 8, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge concluded that challenges by a corrections officer to a Muslim inmate's right to wear a beard did not impose a substantial burden on the inmate's ability to practice his religion.In Williams v. [read post]