Search for: "Case v. Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks"
Results 61 - 80
of 224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 1:06 pm
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued an update to its obviousness guidelines to be used when applying the law of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 4:06 am
(Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court W D Washington holds trademark infringement defendant in contempt: T-Mobile v Terry (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Airfx.com – District Court Arizona denies motion to dismiss on reverse domain name hijacking claim: Airfx.com v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
Mattel (IPKat) Pacific Rim Winemakers – Joyous trademark dispute pits ‘Sweet Bliss’ against ‘Bliss’: Pacific Rim Winemakers, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 10:54 am
By Michael V. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
In Rozenblat v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
Section 146 explains: “In such suits the record in the Patent and Trademark Office shall be admitted on motion of either party . . . [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:13 am
Thanks, in large part, to the wonderful pairing of Nick Godici (ex-Commissioner for Patents ) and John Love (current Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy), a significant portion of the discussions focused on Patent and Trademark Office efforts to implement change. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 11:13 am
Thanks, in large part, to the wonderful pairing of Nick Godici (ex-Commissioner for Patents ) and John Love (current Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy), a significant portion of the discussions focused on Patent and Trademark Office efforts to implement change. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:21 am
Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:03 am
Dee V Benson, US Dist. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:16 am
In his earlier guest-post on the case [here], Paul England described it as “a textbook obviousness and infringement analysis, and one that would serve as a case study in patent courses for the next few years”. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 501 U.S. 868, 878–79 (1991); Glidden Co. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:42 pm
The Commissioner of Patents refused registration of the proposed term on the ground that it was the name of the variety of the rose. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:36 am
See NASCAR Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 7:30 am
(...)Business Week (9/4/2006 Issue 3999, p12) reported that the United States Patent & Trademark Office will no longer accept Wikipedia entries as "accepted sources of information"(...)An interesting article title "Kicking Wiki Out Of The Patent Office" (see http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_36/c3999012.htm#ZZZ6MALU8RE), quotes Patents Commissioner John Doll stating "[t]he problem with Wikipedia is that… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC was heard on 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:00 am
: (SpicyIP), Moving towards the nano age: (SpicyIP), YouTube (Google) and T-Series copyright dispute: (SpicyIP), (TechWhack), JapanIP Value in Japan - the alternative view: (IAM),South KoreaSouth Korea has been urged to strengthen its intellectual property rules in order to sign a free trade agreement with the European Union: (Intellectual Property Watch)The NetherlandsDutch teenager arrested, and another five questioned by police, for allegedly stealing virtual furniture from… [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:12 am
In the pending case of Microsoft v. i4i, the Supreme Court must decide whether the Federal Circuit’s requirement of clear and convincing evidence is proper for an invalidity defense, even though the prior art relied upon by the Defendant was not considered by the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
His main contingent was in Boston, so his basic influence was in Boston, he controlled the Boston Patent Law Association. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 10:06 am
” for trademark practitioners. [read post]
