Search for: "Case v. Fibreboard Corp." Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2023, 1:21 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
Federal Mogul (T&N, FLX, FER) Fiber/Insulation/Brakes -TN – 8.5%; FMP- 6.9% TN=Limpet, Flexitallic, Ferodo (3 trusts); FMP = Fel-Pro/Vellumoid Fibreboard Insulation Products 6.7% Any OCF on West Coast manufactured by Fibreboard – Decent site list Flintkote Many – flooring, fiber supply, more… 8% Terrible Site List – No fiber supply sites despite documentation Fuller-Austin Insulation Company Contact: Linda Harrell (903) 453-2160 Insulations 16.2%… [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation.[5] The plaintiff had characterized the case as a consumer case, with the duty to warn him as the ultimate user. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
In litigating specific causation in so-called toxic tort cases, defense counsel quickly embraced the Manual’s apparent endorsement of the doubling-of-the-risk argument, which would require relative risks in excess of two in order to draw inferences of specific causation in a given case. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am by Schachtman
  See, e.g., In re Fibreboard Corp.,893 F.2d 706, 712 (5th Cir.1990) (“It is evident that these statistical estimates deal only with general causation, for population-based probability estimates do not speak to a probability of causation in any one case; the estimate of relative risk is a property of the studied population, not of an individual’s case. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 2:35 am by Sean Wajert
The courts in In re Fibreboard Corp., 893 F.2d 706 (5th Cir. 1990), and Cimino v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:40 am
Fibreboard Corp., but the high court again declined to certify the class. [read post]