Search for: "Cases v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 78,037
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 1:55 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Last October, I wrote a long post on a new Tenth Circuit decision, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:45 am by Unknown
Update on UK's “Safety of Rwanda” Bill:"UK Parliament approves Rwanda deportation bill, ending weeks of legislative stalemate," AP News, 22 April 2024 [text]UK: Airlines and aviation authorities should not facilitate unlawful removals to Rwanda, UN experts say (OHCHR, 22 April 2024) [text]The obstacles that could still stop flights to Rwanda from taking off (The Conversation, 23 April 2024) [text]Passing of the Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill met with… [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
United States and some miscellaneous examples drawn from congressional records. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
It is our solemn duty to diligently guard these rights regardless of the crime charged, the reputation of the accused, or the pressure to convict (see Boyd v United States, 116 US 616, 635 [1886] [“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon”]). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court recognized the Boy Scouts of America’s First Amendment right to exclude gay men from membership—defining it as the right of “expressive association”—in the case Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Conservatives, Time notes, once looked to universities to “reproduce the middle and upper echelons of Christian society in the United States—something classical liberals from Thomas Jefferson to today’s postliberal academics on the right … have historically appreciated and felt worth conserving. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
United States, I find myself somewhat at a loss as to what points to focus on here. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
Justice Barrett observes that immunity will protect the ex-President in his state court cases — where it is especially needed:Let me ask you about state prosecutions because, if the president has some kind of immunity that's implicit in Article II then that immunity would protect him in -- from state prosecutions as well. [read post]