Search for: "Casey v. People"
Results 81 - 100
of 759
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2022, 4:45 pm
Here is the abstract: Few recent decisions of the Supreme Court have received as much popular attention as Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 2:04 pm
The Supreme Court sided with Petitioners in a 6-3 decision, holding: “[t]he Constitution does not confer a right to abortion; Roe and Casey are overruled; and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 8:58 am
This move represents a shift in the Court’s stare decisis jurisprudence, and would seem to overrule Casey v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Casey, and held that nothing in the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:30 am
Casey relied on privacy is irrelevant. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
The issue may be returned to the political process, where a majority of the people support abortion rights but (it seems) with substantially greater restrictions than those permitted by Roe and Casey.[7] So what is a Catholic Justice to do? [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
Indeed, I see a parallel with West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 7:10 pm
Casey. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Casey termed "potential life. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
The Minnesota Twin, Harry Blackmun, who would write Roe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 7:37 pm
Unlike Roe and Casey, Obergefell was largely accepted without a backlash. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:29 am
Casey, Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter saved the landmark abortion precedent to ensure that people would not view the Court as a political institution. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
This move represents a shift in the Court’s stare decisis jurisprudence, and would seem to overrule Casey v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:27 am
[v]America COMPETES Act, Title X § 1001(5)[vi] NAT’L SCI. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
In overturning Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 10:07 am
Bray, a post-Casey case, was written by Justice Scalia. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Casey and Obergefell v. [read post]
