Search for: "Cass v. Prior" Results 1 - 20 of 88
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 1:48 pm by James Eckert
Though in the instant case Cass' belt was used to drag the deceased and in the prior case it was used to cause death. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:08 am
Such terms and conditions are controlling, as is demonstrated by in the Taylor ruling by the Appellate Division.Taylor v Cass, 505 N.Y.S.2d 929, is an example of the impact of such terms and conditions set out in a disciplinary probation award and the limitations placed on the discretion of the appointing authority to terminated an individual serving a disciplinary probation. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Finding that the appointing authority’s decision to terminate his employment was rationally based and thus was not arbitrary and capricious, in the absence of Petitioner demonstrating that his termination was carried out in bad faith or illegally accomplished, the Appellate Division sustained Petitioner's being summarily removal from his positionFurther, said the court, Petitioner failed to raise an issue of fact sufficient to warrant a hearing as otherwise provided pursuant to… [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A motion for judgment as a matter of law is to be made at the close of an opposing party's case or at any time on the basis of admissions (see CPLR 4401), and the grant of such a motion prior to the close of the opposing party's case generally will be reversed as premature even if the ultimate success of the opposing party in the action is improbable (see Cass v Broome County Coop. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm by Viking
Cass, 127 F.3d 1218, 1223 (10th Cir. 1997); United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:03 am
Cass Sunstein has this interesting article at Bloomberg View. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”Similarly, Taylor v Cass, 122 A.D.2d 885, illustrates impact of a settlement agreement providing for a disciplinary probation award that provided that the appointing authority could summarily terminate the employee without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, "his job performance was adversely affected by his intoxication on the job during the next six months. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”Similarly, Taylor v Cass, 122 A.D.2d 885, illustrates impact of a settlement agreement providing for a disciplinary probation award that provided that the appointing authority could summarily terminate the employee without any hearing if, in the opinion of his superior, "his job performance was adversely affected by his intoxication on the job during the next six months. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Ronald A. Cass
” The Supreme Court’s 1984 decision, Chevron v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
Thanks to How Appealing, I saw this article in the latest issue of the Harvard Law Record headlined "Profs: District of Columbia v. [read post]