Search for: "Castro v. State of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 3:01 pm
Cal.) in Castro v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 2:07 pm
State of Minnesota (McGirt v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As the Supreme Court noted in DHS v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
” Challengers argue that the law is impermissibly extraterritorial because virtually all the pork consumed in California is raised outside the state. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
Zana v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 11:32 am
In a 2016 case, Castro-Ramirez v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 12:40 pm
In Banco Nacional de Cuba v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:56 am
Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 7:37 am
Case citation: U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of California, arguing that he was not given a “meaningful right to apply for asylum,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
As Simon observed (and the insightful and exhaustively researched amicus brief by California and other states attests), the ACA repeatedly mentions the eligibility for subsidized insurance of foreign nationals (noncitizens) who are lawfully present in the United States—the very population that the uninsured ban targets. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
From Castro v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
“For any state that passes a law that violates the Constitution, and in particular Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Joaquin Castro Tweeted the Names of Top Trump Donors. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
The history of its inception is described by Joanna Lydgate in a 2010 article in the California Law Review. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:05 pm
Holden of Oklahoma State University discussed the regulation of sports betting following the Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
§ 1182(f)—the same provision that the government cited to support the travel ban upheld by the Supreme Court term in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:01 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated opinion in Troester v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
The outcome in Trump v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
Castro et al, 2:16-CV-00658-MCE-DB, 2018 WL 2329249, at *3 (E.D. [read post]
