Search for: "Cates v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 6:45 am
United States ex. rel. [read post]
13 May 2020, 2:03 am
United States, 483 U. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/37753-5.10.doc.pdf Federal Law United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States, ex rel. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:36 am
Arnold Schwarzenegger and Corrections Secretary Matt Cate "essentially have told the court that they will reduce the state prison population as the state sees fit, to a level the state deems appropriate, and in a time frame the state has set for itself," the attorneys wrote. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:05 pm
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:00 pm
., chief justice of the United States — at the Four Seasons Hotel in Washington, D.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:43 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 4:36 am
William Ford posted the Fourth Circuit’s ruling against President Trump’s travel ban in IRAP v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:37 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
Barber: The court overruled State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
“We continue to focus on transnational repression, where Chinese authorities have reached into the United States and other countries to repress people critical of Chinese policies. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am
Thomas could not offer the United States District Court jury his opinion on the legality of the contributions. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:37 am
S. 321, 337.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESSyllabusRANSOM v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
United States, 338 U.S. 160, 176, 69 S.Ct. 1302, 1311, 93 L.Ed. 1879 (1948); Woodward v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Newman, Note, Raising the bar and the public interest: on prior restraints, “traditional contours,” and constitutionalizing preliminary injunctions in copyright law, 10 VIRGINIA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LAW JOURNAL 323 (2011)Kimberly Nakamaru, Note, Mining for Manny: electronic search and seizure in the aftermath of United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
Strang v. [read post]
