Search for: "Chambers v. Nation" Results 1 - 20 of 2,724
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2013, 8:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:Countless academics have examined and discussed the importance of Chambers v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:53 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The COC’s service mark, NATIONAL CHAMBER, was refused registration, and the CAFC affirmed.In passing, within the decision:In footnote 1:During prosecution, COC offered a disclaimer of any exclusive rights to the word CHAMBER apart from the composite mark NATIONAL CHAMBER, but only with respect to “providing online directory information services featuring information regarding local and state Chambers of Commerce. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:12 pm
In the second case on Wednesday, No. 06-939, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
After exhausting all national remedies, and after the third section chamber of the ECtHR had found no breach of Halet’s rights under Article 10 ECHR, the case was referred to the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
The Center under Julius Chambers filed a brief in the Grutter v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:21 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center filed a “friend of court” brief in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 1:21 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Yesterday, the National Whistleblower Center filed a “friend of court” brief in Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 7:39 am by INFORRM
On 14 September 2016, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights held a hearing in the case of Satamedia Oy v  Finland. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:31 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Moreover, the Supreme Court's careful analysis of the IEEPA in Dames & Moore v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
Commune de Sausheim v Azelvandre (Case C-552/07); [2009] WLR (D) 64 “The national authorities could not rely on the protection of public order or other interests in order to oppose the disclosure of information on the location of the release of GMOs into the environment. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:00 am
Last week, a group calling themselves The Yes Men apparently perpetrated an elaborate hoax to usurp the corporate persona of the United States Chamber of Commerce, to the point of publishing a fake website and holding a press conference at the National Press Club, posing as the Chamber itself. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:59 am by Carolyn Moskowitz
Phillips, who often epresents the Chamber, has said that “except for the solicitor general representing the United States, no single entity has more influence on what cases the Supreme Court decides and how it decides them than the [Chamber’s] National Chamber Litigation Center. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:24 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Just today, contemporaneously with Leitch's elevation, the National Chamber Litigation Center filed a brief with the Supreme Court (in AT&T v. [read post]