Search for: "Chambers v. Z"
Results 1 - 20
of 86
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Zăicescu and Fălticineanu v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit against the FTC in Texas, claiming that the FTC overstepped its power by creating this rule. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
Schmid and V. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
On October 3, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am
Earlier in July 2023, a blog post by Jacob van de Kerkhof discussed the shortcomings of the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Sanchez v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
In some ways the case reflects the problem posed by Parkes QC in Hodges v Naish. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
” Here, the Court has already found that Bar-Z had a legal right to interfere with App Star’s contracts with the chambers of commerce. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 7:37 am
Dec. 28, 2022): COPPA doesn’t preempt state law equivalents, even if they provide a private right of action and COPPA does not. * NY Times: For Gen Z, TikTok Is the New Search Engine * Cousins v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
(And this is just a raw comparison of rank v. rank; there are more nuanced issues dealing with the weighted Z-scores, scaling, and the like for another day…. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
(And this is just a raw comparison of rank v. rank; there are more nuanced issues dealing with the weighted Z-scores, scaling, and the like for another day…. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Trump v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 4:57 am
One might have thought that, given the Grand Chamber’s judgment in Bayatyan v Armenia [2011] ECHR 1095, states parties would have got the message by now. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:00 am
A few hours after the OPPO v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:22 am
In this post, Mathew Purchase QC of Matrix Chambers shares his views on the Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Z) v Hackney LBC [2020] UKSC 40. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
Georgia 1.00% > $0 1.00% > $0 $4,600 $6,000 $2,700 $7,400 $3,000 (u) 2.00% > $750 2.00% > $1,000 $5,400 $7,100 3.00% > $2,250 3.00% > $3,000 4.00% > $3,750 4.00% > $5,000 5.00% > $5,250 5.00% > $7,000 5.75% > $7,000 5.75% > $10,000 Hawaii 1.40% > $0 1.40% > $0 $2,200… [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:36 pm
Z o.o v. [read post]
