Search for: "Champion v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2018, 10:22 am
Thanks to co-blogger Bob V, we learn about this enterprising family:"A father and son from California have pleaded guilty for their roles in a scheme that defrauded more than $27 million from Affordable Care Act programs in at least 12 states ... [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:33 am
Rashard Mendenhall v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:00 am
Rakofsky v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 2:15 am
Finally, the article will highlight the legal problems posed by § 3509(m) and comment on current case law, including the pending case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:30 am
Ortiz v. [read post]
23 Dec 2004, 12:01 pm
On one track, state and federal courts will reverse and revise Manson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
I have been hearing for awhile that there is a chance that the South Carolina State Legislature may take action in response to the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Branham v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:30 am
Warren Bridge and Briscoe v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 11:05 am
" State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:20 am
Banki (reach of a regulatory crime narrowed under the rule of lenity); United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:30 am
Notwithstanding, state and local law may prohibit LGBT discrimination where you operate. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:45 am
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, Law School, is publishing When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:27 am
The Court of Appeals never reaches the merits.The case is Soule v. [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 6:37 am
Editor's Note: I have written (Champion, July 2007) on the possibilities of satellite or video conferenced testimony for witnesses who are outside the United States, and whose testimony may be better suited to "live" rather than Rule 15 depositions. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:25 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School Professor and champion of a less copyright-restricted Internet, last month joined forces with the Electronic Frontier Foundation to file suit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against a Melbourne, Australia-based record company that accused the professor of infringing on a copyrighted song by using it in a lecture presented on YouTube.In his 11-page complaint, Lessig v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
We’ve collectively cheered our world champion Phillies and wrung our hands over last minute Eagles’ losses. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:30 am
Supreme Court decision, Mapp v. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 4:51 am
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 6:22 am
In the 1859 case Ableman v. [read post]
