Search for: "Chance v. Board of Examiners" Results 21 - 40 of 481
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 3:09 am
Employee's refusal to produce medical records results in dismissal of lawsuitPeters-Turnbull v NYC Board of Education, CA2, 7 Fed. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:20 am
Thus, the Board did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in refusing to use last-chance settlement agreements as comparators.O’Hara v. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 3:18 pm by Howard Knopf
Such an application would have had a good chance of success if vigorously pursued at the time, in my view. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:45 am by Joy Waltemath
On appeal, he argued that he had been denied due process because the board had denied his request to introduce live testimony from his patients and had denied him the chance to cross-examine them. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:51 am
"A closer examination of plaintiffs' claim seems to be, in reality, dissatisfaction with how the formula is weighed and implemented by the state Board of Education, not the formula itself," Bradford wrote. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:24 pm
Frye's inventive shoe with a "forwardly-inclined, reverse wedge" got a chance to put a new foot forward: examiner rejection reversed by the Board - Ex parte Nancy Fyre. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:40 am
I doubt you were as efficient as the Board in Corby Distilleries Limited v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 8:12 am by Patricia Salkin
Here, the record demonstrated that Stuart had the chance to challenge the city’s position even without the formality of cross-examination. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 10:56 pm by Beard Stacey & Jacobsen, LLP
“The chances of survival are immediately lessened when this vital gear is either not on board or inoperable. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am by Nico Cordes
In its decisions G 9/91 and G 10/91, the Enlarged Board of Appeal rephrased the questions referred to it as being inter alia "whether or not - or to what extent - an Opposition Division or a Board of Appeal [...] is bound by the statement of the opponent under Rule 55(c) EPC [1973] of the extent to which the patent is opposed and of the grounds for opposition" (see G 9/91, reasons 5; emphasis by this board).6.1 It then asks whether it would be correct to consider… [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm by John L. Welch
Essentially, if the examiner finds a single online dictionary or chat board where someone says "that's vulgar," then that is usually enough for the examiner, the TTAB, and the Federal Circuit.So, another 2(a) denial is just a "ho hum" event. [read post]