Search for: "Chandler v. District of Columbia"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
”); Trs. of Columbia Univ. v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 2:09 am
In a long-running case in the District Court for the District of Columbia, Magistrate Judge John Facciola ruled on April 1 that a judgment against a False Claims Act defendant survived his death four years ago, and stayed the case pending a motion for substitution under Rule 25. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Lofton Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0606n.06 Chandler v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Murphy Middle District of Tennessee at Columbia 08a0276n.06 Woods v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy and David Kravets at WIRED have coverage of the Department of Justice’s brief on remand in Jones, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
And so he does again in his latest Sidebar Column on the most important case of the decade, District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 10:00 am
“ The demise of novelty as an element of idea theft cases has its roots in the 1957 case of Chandler v Roach. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Wingerter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 6:49 am
Chandler, 5 La. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch.… [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff is a "national cable television network dedicated to reporting on legal and judicial systems of the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 7:35 pm
Plaintiff is a "national cable television network dedicated to reporting on legal and judicial systems of the United States, the 50 states, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
