Search for: "Chapman v. King*" Results 41 - 60 of 88
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Johnson v Steele, heard 29 October 2014 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Mr Chapman rightly acknowledged that one system of law governs the entire tortious claim. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
In Ottawa yesterday, a gunman “shot and killed a soldier,” Cpl. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
The interim order was unsuccessfully challenged and Carr was granted an injunction against the press until further notice (Carr v News  Group Newspapers [2005] EWHC 971 (QB)). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Yours faithfully Solicitors David Jockelson Miles and Partners Kate Hammond Miles and partners Sarah Cove Miles and Partners Amanda Dench Miles and Partners Pauline Lloyd Ewings & Co Peggy Ray Goodman Ray Gwen Williams Goodman Ray Hilka Hollmann Goodman Ray Joanna Bosanquet  Goodman Ray Michael Bourdages Goodman Ray Christina Blacklaws  TV Edwards David Emmerson T V Edwards Lorraine Green TV Edwards Susan Fitzgerald TV Edwards Valerie Greenfield  Fisher Meredith LLP… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
Following Mid Bedfordshire District Council v Brown [2004] EWCA Civ 1709, South Cambridgeshire District Council v Gammell [2005] EWCA Civ 1429 and Wychavon District Council v Rafferty [2006] EWCA Civ 628, however, on committal applications and applications to vary injunctions which were being breached, "maintaining the authority of court orders is an o [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Liam Thornton
Relying in particular on the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Chapman v United Kingdom, Charleton J. refused the relief sought, noting that there was no obligation under the ECHR to provide persons with a particular form, type or standard of accommodation. [read post]