Search for: "Chapman v. Trump"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
After the Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
It is also a key element of Hernandez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court disposed of last week’s one new relist, Chapman v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:38 pm
Represented only by Chapman University law professor John Eastman, Trump sought permission to formally intervene in the case, Texas v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:11 am
Nathan Chapman and Michael McConnellWe appreciate the lively discussion of Justice Chase’s opinion in Calder v. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 8:54 am
See, e.g., Drake v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm
The controlling case, Richey v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
” Birthright citizenship stems from the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment which was meant to override the 1857 Dred Scott v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 12:11 pm
It is also a key element of Hernandez v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:22 am
Having been unsuccessful in its arguments, White Rock cannot now have a second bite at the apple in this proceeding (Chapman Steamer Collective, LLC v KeyBank Natl Assn., 163 AD3d 760, 761 [2d Dept 2018] [party cannot relitigate any claim which was, could or should have been litigated in prior proceeding]; John Grace & Co., Inc. v Tunstead, Schecter & Torre, 186 AD2d 15, 19-20 [1st Dept 1992] [collateral estoppel and res judicata barred legal malpractice where, in… [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:14 pm
The relatively brief per curiam opinion in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 4:12 pm
Much of today’s hearing revolved around John Eastman, a Chapman University professor who advised Trump in the lead-up to the Jan. 6 attack. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
Knauff v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
He is also a senior fellow and director of the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence at the Claremont Institute, on whose behalf he filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the federal government’s position in Trump v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
At Real Clear Policy, Nathan Chapman argues that Justice Neil Gorsuch’s separate concurrence in Sessions v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 3:32 pm
It will come out next year, suitably revised to take account of feedback, in a symposium on presidential power to be published by the Chapman Law Review. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm
In Ziglar v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am
As part of a 1982 decision, Plyler v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:30 am
Represented by lawyers for the state, Chapman came to the Supreme Court last year, asking the justices to take up her case and weigh in on the question of immunity – including whether, in the wake of the court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
” Gravel v. [read post]
