Search for: "Chappell v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 93
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 2:48 pm
Nor was he permitted to compare his situation to that of others who had received the discretionary relief he said he would plausibly have also received; that mode of analysis is off the table after United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
United States — federal court authority to require the government to transfer guns seized from an individual without a legal right to have a gun Tibble v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Chappell, 14-6264, likewise ended in denial, though not without criticism from Justice Sotomayor (joined by Justice Breyer) of the state’s foot-dragging in providing post-conviction counsel for petitioner’s state habeas claim. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:41 am
United States, No. 13-10639, two Justices -- Anthony M. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Chappell, 14-6264, a pro se petition in a capital case out of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
United States, 14-5227, and Freidus v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:51 am
United States), and whether it is unconstitutional for a state court to exclude an accused individual and defense lawyers from a hearing to examine the legality of prosecutors’ exclusion of minority jurors from serving (Chappell v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:40 am
United States Chappell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:10 am
Chappell v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
We end the Ninth Circuit hit parade with Chappell v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Chappell v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Chappell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:54 pm
At no point has the United States ever executed more than a tiny fraction of one percent of its murderers. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
’ Chappell v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
The President can fire any policy-making executive officer, including the United States Attorney General and United States Attorney, but the Governor cannot fire the California Attorney General or the county district attorneys. [read post]
