Search for: "Cherry v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2008, 1:01 am
  Sure the Cartoon Network can appeal to the United States Supreme Court, but the question of direct copyright infringement is not the interesting one to pursue, and MIPTC predicts SCOTUS won't take TCN's petition for certiorari. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am by Jan von Hein
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 7:33 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case shows that the so-called "rule of completeness" has its limits.The case is United States v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am by Peter Margulies
The “it” in Giuliani’s explanation could also refer to pausing certain immigration temporarily, in order to assess whether the United States’ current criteria for screening immigrants actually work. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:00 am by Jo Dale Carothers
”  A patent applicant is not entitled to a patent when the claimed invention was “in public use… more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]