Search for: "Chicago Park District v. City of Chicago" Results 41 - 60 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2021, 7:38 am by Eugene Volokh
" —Carl Smith, Northwestern University, author of City Water, City Life and Chicago's Great Fire "Lakefront is an excellent book that adds much to our understanding of development along Lake Michigan within the City of Chicago. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:30 am by ernst
"    Carl Smith, Northwestern University, author of City Water, City Life and Chicago's Great Fire     "Lakefront is an excellent book that adds much to our understanding of development along Lake Michigan within the City of Chicago. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia use ad valorem taxes; only seven states assess a flat surcharge; and two states levy both an ad valorem tax and a flat-dollar surcharge. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The friend—now permanently disabled—sued the City of Chicago, claiming that the police department maintained a culture of impunity that led the officer to believe he could get away with the shooting. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:19 pm by Lisa Soronen
Chicago Park District, involving a free exercise claim to bring a guinea hog to a park to practice Satanism, the wind will no longer be at their backs. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Charles, Calumet City, Orland Park, Aurora, Highland Park, Northbrook, Evanston, Schaumburg, Schiller Park, Elgin, Chicago (West Town, East Garfield Park, Little Italy, Bridgeport, Douglas, Bronzeville, Grand Boulevard, Brighton Park, Back of the Yards, Englewood, South Shore, Jackson Park, Rogers Park, Lakeview, Irving Park East, Portage Park, Oriole Park), Elk Grove Village, Mount Prospect,… [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 11:51 am by Danielle D'Onfro
The Supreme Court will hear argument Tuesday in City of Chicago v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
City of Chicago, (ED IL, July 20, 2020), an Illinois federal district court held that plaintiff Church adequately pleaded that the city's parking regulations imposed a "substantial burden" under RLUIPA on its religious exercise. [read post]